Rooms

Explore stories and patterns together.

Bring participants, facilitators and sponsors into a shared inquiry, with clear access boundaries.

  • Bring people together around real participant evidence instead of summaries alone
  • Separate facilitator, participant, and sponsor visibility before the session starts
  • Support live or asynchronous group interpretation without losing the collection context

How pricing works

Rooms are usually included with Praxis ($129/mo billed annually, $1,548/yr, or $149 monthly) and Event Passes, or can be scoped as a collaboration module.

  • Included with Praxis (9 decision rooms) and Event Passes (3 live rooms).
  • Usually scoped when role separation and collaborative review matter.
  • Not necessary for solo review or one-off bounded collection.

Why teams add Rooms

Create guided collaborative spaces

Rooms give you bounded places for the right people to work with the material together.

  • Separate participant, facilitator, and review spaces clearly
  • Reduce confusion about who is seeing what and why
  • Keep session structure matched to the real audience

Keep the conversation evidence-linked

Collaborative interpretation works better when people can stay close to the stories and patterns underneath the conversation.

  • Bring real contributions into the room without flattening them first
  • Reduce drift into generic opinion exchange
  • Support comparison, tension, and careful interpretation

Support real facilitation, not meeting theater

Rooms work best when they are paired with facilitation decks and clear session purpose.

  • Guide shared interpretation with enough structure to keep momentum
  • Help teams move from what we heard to what we think it means
  • Create a cleaner bridge into next actions or publication decisions

Where it fits best

Team and program leads

Use it when: When you need a working space where a project team can review evidence together before deciding what happens next.

Value: Helps collaborative interpretation happen in a bounded and reviewable way.

Public and community settings

Use it when: When dialogue, legitimacy, or shared interpretation matters and the work cannot be reduced to a report-out alone.

Value: Creates a safer way to work with difference, disagreement, and mixed visibility.

Facilitators and consultants

Use it when: When sessions need more than a deck and require distinct spaces for live review, participant contribution, or sponsor reflection.

Value: Turns collaborative sensemaking into a designed experience instead of an improvised meeting.

What this enables

  • Collaborative spaces that stay connected to the inquiry already in motion
  • Clearer role and visibility boundaries for shared interpretation
  • A stronger path from evidence review into facilitated action or publication

How teams usually bring it in

  1. Clarify who needs to work with the material together
  2. Decide what visibility boundaries the room needs before inviting people in
  3. Add collaborative Rooms when a collector or report alone is no longer enough